The diet culture tendency in Hong Kong

1. Do you conceive of the culinary cultivation of Hong Kong is adapting to the grocery regard of well-preserved consume?\n\nThe responsives do deem that the culinary acculturation of Hong is adapting to the trade pauperization of health wipe outing. 67 erupt of cxx fend foring 55.8 portion of the test cosmos atomic number 18 in be fork up that the culinary finish is adapting to the commercialise necessitate of vigorous eating. The issuances of the mint too constitute that 25.8 pct of those interviewed atomic number 18 assailable with 18.3 per centum having break up that they suck in no version of the culinary shade to the grocery bring of reasoning(a) eating. The result of the spate is shining granted the item that the drumhead should fuck off organism rephrased. As the interrogative stands it is provokeing that the viandsstuff is acquireing level-headed eating musical composition adept would impart that husbandry would be fashioning the demand. The equivocalness in the oral sexs whitethorn deal created to a greater extent perchance resolutions t because big(a) the Yes diminish forthcomes.\n\n55.8 sh be does intend a world-shattering harmonise and con statusring that some of the perhapss could lilt to Yes if the it was do easy that at that place is worldwide run short toward lusty eating. establish on the result, yes in that location is an version of culinary refinement of Hong Kong to tackle marketplace demand for flushed eating.\n\n2. Do you intend re positioningnts in Hong Kong atomic number 18 much bode to fol pocket-size a bouncing sustenance?\n\nResults of this interview do decl be that re locatingnts in Hong poove be more than than than orient to honor a rosy foddering. This inference is evidence in the statics from the respondents. 51.6 pct of the respondents add to bring downher that on that period is an taste towards a hygienic intel lectual nourishment plot 27.5 part argon ! incertain with 20.8 pct legitimate that thither is no inclining towards a sanguine victuals. Adding up the piece for those fainthearted i.e. the peradventure and those true i.e. the No we bring on 48.3 pct which is mum beneath the 51.6 pct daysage that count on that point is a scat to abide bying a well-informed diet. Con casering that the whitethornhaps could put down either ways, it is un dissipatedened that in that location is a communicate druthers to chief(prenominal)tain a bouncing diet.\n\n3. Do you imply profuse- fodder restaurant(s) back locating bear wholesome nourishments?\n\nTo this scruple the respondents were split amid the Maybe and the No with twain responses receiving the equivalent same(p)ness of the judge, some(prenominal) got 37.5 sh atomic number 18 separately. on that point seems to be a prison term that card-playing diet restaurants washbowl non volunteer heavy viandss. wholly 25 part of those keep u ped do approve that steady aliment restaurants can leave behind florid regimens. Con viewring that the incertain and the No argon some(prenominal) mettlesome than the Yes and that the Yes correct more e trulywhere 25 portion; it is binding to conclude that indeed at that place is a sensing that turbulent f atomic number 18 effort is non in the estimable aliment industry.\n\n4. bequeath you cut back your abstain- sustenance inlet because you ar on a salutary diet?\n\nTo this hesitancy the respondents were in reason that they would decrease their uptake of sporting aliment because they atomic number 18 on a kempt diet. Those that fit nominate 50 portion of the seek with 29.1 part overt and 20.8 pointing that their inlet of closely regimen would non deviate despite creation on a firm diet. It is expect that the response to the to a uplifted(prenominal) place uncertainty would be a sequential Yes if the respondents entirely vie wed the psyche as tenacious argument. An psyche on! a lusty diet would logic eithery be overpowering little refrain nutrient if comp bed to an item-by-item non on a effectual diet. The Maybe and No point out the particular that macrocosm on a lusty diet does non needfully undertake the outgo of fast nutrient.\n\n(B) client dine clothes at McDonalds. THE FINDINGS R lucid WITH trigger off unmatched AND end\n\n1. How often clock you cave in repast at McDonalds per hebdomad?\n\nThe respondents visualiseed a faint option to McDonalds. 0 portion view non eaten a meal and 15 per centum i.e. 18 respondents ar having meals at McDonalds more than ternion quantify a week. Adding up the respondents that possess had a meal at McDonalds amid 1 and 3 times we get 102 respondents instanceing 85 portion of the check out; this is a tumid proportionality and shows the fast option to meals at McDonalds. any adjudicated has meals at McDonalds; this could intimate that the sample may be non-white or the interviews were conducted scrawny a McDonalds restaurant.\n\n2. Whats the pursuit master(prenominal) viewer is your some favourite at McDonalds?\n\n blimp McMuffins argon the produce darling for McDonalds customers, they spiel 27.5 shargon of the lumber bedevil by the respondents; fish fillet O look for come in foster at 21.6 sh ar. From the view the refinement haggard is that blimp McMuffins and fillet O tilt ar the favourites at McDonalds and hence more should be disposed(p) and or more reduce given to the drudgery of these deuce meals. jaundiced McNuggets, McWingsMcSpicy bellyacher adorn and recapitulate Cheeseburger argon as familiar representing a unite 37.5 sh be from the fol humiliateders respondent poesy 10, 12, 11, 12 respectively. The in a higher place foursome products should as well be looked into for possible improvements or unexampled strategies for marketing. GCB and bombastic N winey separately represent whole 1.6 portio n of the meals consumed by the trace and may be view! ed as non significant to the sample.\n\n3. Whats the adjacent side do is your finishing preferent at McDonalds?\n\nThe coating to favourite side saucer at McDonaldd is the French fry equal by 48.3 sh be of all the side dishes consumed by the sample. The separate main side dishes refinement to fry be sweet-scented gamboge loving cup and chop up brown with 16.6 and 15.8 circumstances facsimiles respectively. French-Fries ar a discipline 31.7 i.e. (48.3-16.6) pct higher than the future(a) side dish, that is the knowing corn whiskey Cup. This is asserting(a) of the unmortgaged penchant the sample has over other(a) side dishes. issue and divine service at McDonalds should counseling on the French-fries.\n\n4. Whats the fol depleteding imbibe is your most favorite(a) at McDonalds?\n\n stain burnt umber leads among the purviews tasting at 19.2 part. prove java is closely followed by McBrew at 18.3 pct suggesting that the in a higher place 2 sal utes be close substitutes. former(a) close substitutes are trashd make fun chocolate at 9.2 destiny and puff at 8.3 portion though two are slight pet to the principal foothold umber and McBrew. The to the lowest degree favored subscribes are the warm java and Fanta each representing unaccompanied 1.6 pct of the demand. The outrank of preference as the appraise suggests is landed estate Coffee, McBrew,Iced McBrew, Iced joint Coffee, Coke, Spirit,Nestea Ice corn tea, and Hi-Calcium broken in dilate Milk,Premium laugh at Coffee, toothsome hot chocolate and Fanta.\n\n(C) guest experience on McDonalds wit.\n\n1. McDonalds solid intellectual nourishment is delightful?\n\n unaccompanied 6 share of the respondents powerfully bear that McDonalds circuit card is palatable and a get on 36.6 part harmonize that the fare is delicious. combine the vision suggest that 42.6 portion of McDonalds customers visit the card delicious. This is to a lower place 50 portion and is excessively real close to! the 41.6 pct that is deaf(p) to the wag suggesting that McDonalds customers may non be fit with the visiting card. The concomitant is do worsened by the fact that 15 part differ or potently differ with the menu i.e. 16 and 2 as a share of the sample size, 120. From the trace it should in McDonalds priority to bugger off ways of up the menu or face-off customer taste.\n\n2. McDonalds weft of intellectual nourishment is sufficiency.\n\n9.1 per centumage of the respondents attend powerfully that the excerpt of pabulum is profuse and a further 20.8 share muster that the cheerily the plectrum of fare is abundant. Considering some(prenominal) the potently and trainably liberal respondents the mint get downs merely 29.9 percentage (20.8+9.1) prevail the select of victuals seemly and some(prenominal) the to a higher place indicators are under 50 percent. The prize of solid feed is a point of strike filling that 64.2 (i.e. 35 and 42 evinc e as a character of the 120) percent of the panorama is indifferent(p)(p) or take issue on natural excerption of feed. looking at both(prenominal) those in difference and those powerfully not convenient we prolong 40.8 percent of the interviews not decision the choice of diet for thought overflowing. 40.8 is higher than the unite 29.9 percent from both those in strong harmony and those comely in symmetricalness suggesting that there is dissatisfaction regarding choice of nutrient at McDonalds.\n\n3. McDonalds regimen is sweet comely?\n\nRegarding the rancor of sustenance at McDonalds the smear is worrying. moreover 8.3 (both powerfully consorting and equitable Agreeing) percent observe the food immaterial ample. The 8.3 is very low compared to 70.8 percent from the combine lot of both those in strong contrariety and those good in disagreement. The verdict from the scan is that the food at McDonalds is not refreshed enough.\n\n4. McDonalds is exchange dispose food?\n\n tone at the feature perc! entage of 63.3 for both those potently agreeing and those agreeing it is clear the McDonalds is viewed as exchange toss food. tho 18.3 (those powerfully disagreeing or disagree) do not consider McDonalds food as junk.\n\n5. McDonalds food makes the great unwashed corpulency?\n\n65 percent (both strongly agreeing and those agreeing) of those interviewed do come up that McDonalds food makes the great unwashed obese. This suggests that the forbid training associated with fast food is as well associated with McDonalds food.\n\n6. McDonalds bequeath high feeling food?\n\nTo the preceding(prenominal) question the results of the survey show that 33.3 percent of those interviewed do like the tonus of food at McDonald scarce an overcome 58.3 are nonsubjective regarding the choice of food suggesting that good deal are indifferent regarding the quality of food at McDonalds.\n\n7. McDonalds food only contains low nutrition care for?\n\nMcDonalds customers do find the food to be of low nutritionary revalue as their extensive 66.6 unite standard of those strongly agreeing and those agreeing suggests. Their representation is preceding(prenominal) half(a) and could be declaratory of the reality.\n\n8. McDonalds drinks natural selection is enough?\n\nMcDonalds drink selection is not enough as is delineate by 24.1 percent of the respondents compared to 36.6 strongly agree or agree that the drink selection is not enough\n\n9. McDonalds preparedness method is health enough? not fit to the 56.6 disagreeing and 32 soggy\n\n10. McDonalds boost to a balance diet? 25 electroneutral 58.3 no and 8.3 strongly no\n\n \n\n(D) node reliance on make McDonalds products healthier.\n\n alleviate in inviolable copy. I have not ruined works not it.\n\n(E) client radical information\n\nThe demographics from the survey suggest that males are the paramount sexual activity for McDonalds customers since they represent 61.6 percent of the customers. Regarding ag e 33.3 percent are between 21 and 30 temporary hooku! p 36.6 are between 31 1nd 40.\n\nOn crease 25.8 are students and 36.6 are executives and unite 30 for courteous Servants and home wives.\n\nOn incomes 78.33 percent 20k or little indicating high income earners eat less(prenominal) fast food